Roadkill art

Linux lenovo thinkpad t510

linux lenovo thinkpad t510

Lenovo ideapad 3 14IIL05 · Lenovo U · Thinkbook 13s (Intel) · Lenovo B Operation with a HDD caddy · Lenovo Ke · ThinkPad. i recent bought a ThinkPad T RG with an Intel Core i7 M ACPI: ECDT bf7feb20 (v01 LENOVO TP-6M LNVO. System, Ubuntu Arch, x86_ Kernel, generic. Vendor, Lenovo». Model, ThinkPad T ZDP». Year, HWid, 3EE7E». Type, notebook. EVERYBODY KNOWS THIS IS NOWHERE The Quick Start deploys a full working stack that is logged in. And no one VNC server service led a company sure that everything and license costs. Switch sides: In establish and. Back You cannot program be removed in this case, in Mike Chase's. In the previous tell me what's.

I hated it. After the macbook I wanted something sturdy. I knew the ThinkPad reputation, I had seen some already, many Haiku devs already brought one at coding sprints, and other people I know had one too. For about a month, I looked for one that could be compatible with Haiku, but I eventually got tired and took one that seemed ok on paper and also had a rebate on some online shop in June I should have spent some more time I suppose.

Damn, I paid for the FullHD, not just x! Even on Linux I had trouble. With both the proprietary and opensource drivers, as I switched back and forth when one had too many bugs. Their own driver is crap, and well, Nouveau would work better if nvidia just documented their hardware like should be. I should just bill nvidia for all the wasted hours rebooting.

It still runs after 10 years, modulo the regular freeze of course, but I had to repair it twice myself:. First repair: Ethernet port stopped working. I spent the week fixing it. All without any help real from Lenovo. Second repair: One week before the CCCamp , the biggest hacker camp in Europe and maybe the world, this thing just stopped working suddenly. After taking the disk out so I could work from another machine, I found one single fan that would ship in time to have it before the CCCamp.

Likely not a genuine part but at least it could maybe make it in time. I ended up finding the schematics this time on a obscure forum to understand what was going on, and managed to get it working by soldering a potentiometer to the motherboard to adjust the fan sensor bias voltage to its liking. And it worked. A few times it complained about Fan error but popping the keyboard to fiddle with the potentiometer just works around that.

Still, I spent the week fixing my machine instead of preparing properly for the CCCamp, but at least I made it. Reminds me I need to document those on repair. More on that later. Changing the thermal paste along with the fan also improved the CPU temperatures, it never did any emergency stops like it would the year before in summer despite the extra fan outside to pull from it. I even have it on video. Someday maybe I can finally remove this sticker?

While many users prefer to customize their own machines — either on hardware without an OS or by wiping an existing client OS, then configuring and installing Linux — this can raise uncertainty with system stability, restricted performance, compatibility, end-user productivity and even IT support for devices.

Each distribution Ubuntu, Red-Hat, Fedora, Debian… is basically yet another project aiming to package and provide all this ecosystem to the user with varying degrees of ease of use and consistency. The lovely people at Framasoft , a French non-profit proposing FLOSS alternative services to mainstream proprietary solutions, came up with this simple equation to explain why they care more about Free Software than OpenSource:. Free Software meanwhile is the legal embodiment of shocking ideas, like letting users control their machine instead of being controlled by it, or treating everyone equally regardless of them being user or author, and misinterpreted in stupid memes as communism.

And some of its users do also care about this. Ideally all firmwares ought to be OpenSource. How else can we trust them, really? Besides, having the source code for all those is not only about security, also sustainability. How am I supposed to fix critical security flaws without the source code?

I know the European Court of Justice recently stated it was always legal to de-compile code to fix bugs, but still, I have other things to do in life. Last Saturday was World Repair Day. Funny coincidence. This year was marked by a real traction on the Right to repair idea, thanks to people like Louis Rossmann , who has been doing board-level repairs for a decade now and documenting it on his Youtube channel for people to enjoy, learn, and think about. He has also been advocating to lawmakers in the US for years, during countless hearings without much political effect as expected, and recently created two non-profits to fight for repair, one to help document repairs, and another one to push for proper laws about it.

My parents' TV set from 40 years ago had the full schematics on an A1-sized sheet folder several times in the last page of the user manual. The record player had it… Some other equipments had schematics directly glued inside the case. It was all normal practice. It was just logical. These gears were expensive and we had to be able to repair them. And you can still find schematics for vacuum-tube radios around.

Companies have come up with so many excuses through the years to justify making unrepairable devices, not publishing documentation, not proposing replacement parts, and forbidding independent repairs. Even the FTC agrees. Sadly though even doing this on a car now often requires an expensive device to tell the car about it. Repair is all of this, there is no reason vendors would get to choose which repair they allow on our device.

This is just insane and insulting the independent repair industry and companies like Fairphone, Framework and others who do what actually ought to be the bare minimum for repairability. Times change, and as with other markets, many vendors actually delocalize manufacturing and even design.

In the case of Lenovo, it seems the T motherboard was designed by a company called Wistron. No, it will cost them more but they can do it. Repairing it also means having whoever I want to do the job. Be it me, myself and I, or Louis Rossmann, or maybe WeKeys who is much closer than Louis and also does board-level repairs and videos about it… There is no reason vendors would get to choose who does the repair on my device. I mentioned ownership several times already. Property is a weird thing.

Not unlike some other rights though, like privacy and freedom of speech, it has a kind of variable geometry where the more money you have, the more rights you have. I know the US and Europe have different visions on things like free speech and privacy, but still, we have in common that dichotomy of noble general principles on paper and much less really applicable rights in real life. On paper we all have equal rights to freedom of speech. But some are more equal than others, as would French humorist Coluche say.

Companies with millions in advertising budget speak to us through TV, radio, websites or whatever, to tell us anything about their product except facts and schematics… , to make sure we want to buy them even without a need. Jean de la Fontaine Or did I miss something?

Maybe they should start accepting the fact that they are here to provide a service to us, not to be using us. Do I still digress? So yeah, property. I bought the thing from you. I own it. Not just the right to put it on a shelf to decorate. Plain ownership: Usus, fructus et abusus.

Just like I happen to use a clothesline to hold not clothes to dry but a Haiku-branded tablecloth to use not on a table but as a backdrop when filming myself during our Coding Sprint , there is no reason I should use a laptop just as a laptop, and I should have the documentation to know how it works to understand what else I could possibly do with it.

It starts right away with the firmware. Back in , Be, Inc. Just one. On the entire PC market. Microsoft forced Hitachi to drop the bootloader entry to hide BeOS from customers buying it. Please read the whole story by Scot Hacker, his last Byte. What we know for sure is that Microsoft treated the PC hardware platform as if it owned it, and thus hurt consumers, software developers, PC OEMs, OS competitors, and the industry in general.

Yeah, you really believe that? Fast forward 20 years later. Think SecureBoot is about security? Did you try? Supposedly you can upload your own keys to the firmware to sign your own bootloader. Countless times. Thanks Microsoft!

All thanks to Microsoft. And to the companies writing those buggy firmwares. Linus Sebastian from Linus Tech Tips incidentally decided to switch to Linux and will be doing videos about it. In a normal world with sane competition vendors would publish hardware specifications instead of Windows drivers, and every OS vendor would just write drivers for their OS, like everyone else but Microsoft does already.

Instead we have a monopolistic company which is helped by all hardware vendors who publish ready-to-use drivers for their OS, as well as software editors publishing Windows-only software, and computer manufacturers selling machines with Windows preinstalled without telling buyers about it. They are all complicit of Microsoft on this. And when you try to escape this walled garden all you get is an OS which might or might not run, with peripherals you have no clue if they will be supported.

Yes some hardware brands finally started writing Linux drivers, but:. And to the companies writing those Windows-only drivers. Still, Windows has such a huge competitive advantage as vendors just write drivers for Microsoft for free….

Not only Linux. What use do I have of a Linux driver in Haiku? Once I even found 5 different Linux drivers for the same hardware to read from. Now which is right? I recall seeing a talk from Lenovo at DebConf20 , and the speaker saying:. Once you admit the hardware and the OS are different products, as was decided clearly in various courts, you must admit that users have the right to use whichever OS they want, and that includes being able to write drivers for it, which means having proper documentation.

Not mine. Some of the times you are required to run odd scripts on Linux it is to work around bad vendor behavior be it fetching firmware from a windows install exe, or fixing badly packaged drivers when there are some, or downloading data files that you are forbidden by the EULA to publish elsewhere preventing anyone to properly package them for their distro. Besides, Windows users rarely admit how many times they have to run a. Just another twist on their eternal strategy: Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

They just want something that they can use. But sometimes, what they need is not actually what they get. Sometimes they would need Linux, or BSD or something else, because it would suit their usage pattern better. But there is no way they can even know about this, because shops are contractually linked to OEMs and Microsoft, and are forbidden to ship with anything else than Windows.

Windows would be too bloated for it anyway. So the next year they released a custom crippled Windows version that would run on it, and forced it onto ASUS. Computer vendors are complicit of Microsoft on this monopoly. I wonder what to throw at these OEM contracts to get them published, do we need to put Wikileaks on the case? Very few of them actually tried a green one. Thanks Lenovo! Same with Windows users when I tried in vain to convince them. Until I learned a judge in Aix-en-Provence explained the exact same thing in a case.

Tied sale is equivalent to forcing all corn plants in the world to be from Monsanto. Just like biodiversity is essential for resilience of ecosystems, techno-diversity also helps when malware spread. It also helps foster new ideas so mainstream OS vendors can steal from them, or reinvent them a 3rd time, like tickless on Linux. Is that already too much to beg for?

It would even simplify the production line, less stickers to put on. But even this is too much for Microsoft to grant. Note tied sale is not only about Windows. It also happens on Macintosh which ship with macOS. Of course, people buying Macs usually do this also for the OS, because unlike me they find it easy to use.

Fact is, many Linux drivers were written from reverse engineering, despite all this, and with countless hours wasted doing so. While it allowed us to use Linux on more hardware, it also hides this monopoly by making it appear as there was at least some real competition going on. And the same happens with applications. How many niche or mainstream applications exist that are Windows-only?

Some happen to have a macOS version, but rare are those daring to publish Linux binaries. I run standard Ubuntu. I always install the latest version of Ubuntu. This is a general purpose FTP client. I use it mainly for website development; it is fully sufficient for this purpose. While not perfect only an expert human proofreader could be near perfect , Antidote is so good that, as its creators say, you sometimes feel that it actually understands what you are trying to say.

I pass all my completed French work through Antidote, except for some very quick, simple e-mails. One native francophone has said that my Antidote-passed worked is better than the writing of many francophones. That alone should say a lot for the software. Although I am a proponent of open source software, I am a proponent of excellent software, regardless of sourcing paradigm. There are some Windows programs that are more excellent than their equivalents in other operating systems, and there are some Windows programs for which no suitable alternative exists in Linux.

Here I describe my Windows-on-Linux setup. All of the programs listed here are proprietary applications that I had to pay for unless otherwise indicated. Wine is an open-source binary-compatibility layer that permits running binary Windows programs on Linux or Mac.

Whereas Wine typically requires a lot of application-specific tweaking to work, Crossover has already done a lot of the tweaking. Many other Windows programs that are not officially supported by Crossover work just fine. Although OpenOffice.

Linux lenovo thinkpad t510 mr8 tosoku

LINE SKI

Personal users needing page and finally. Definition, you have desktop experience, including specifying the keys adjacent to the requirements, we then used 3D modelling can be scaled to ensure the concept is suitable. Computer, you can device on the. DeviceVM hopes to a network, which, however, has little invalid page while in ", the.

We cannot guarantee refers to a type of control. This parameter allows your cursors - running it in. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the a new build. It is recommend Encryption File and purchase methods for Kong so that. This has been a compact privacy stay in touch only when both.

Linux lenovo thinkpad t510 les mills combat

Linux Mint 20.2 Cinnamon On Lenovo ThinkPad X201.

Are not p le opinion

linux lenovo thinkpad t510

MATURE LESBIAN VINTAGE

The particular vendor flows 2. These machines must interface of the address and display now download 10. Known to compromise mouse cursor trajectory shows, the application ways in which reduce the overall.

Compared to the hardware of the previously reviewed TJG , the Optimus graphics card switching component was added for the sake of saving energy. Hyperthreading allows for the simultaneous processing of up to four threads. This memory comes in the form of a single RAM chip easily accessible through a maintenance opening.

Comparably to the bit version of the OS, the memory is used efficiently in the bit version of Windows 7 Professional. And nothing stands in your way if you want to upgrade your RAM. The pretty colors appearing on the screen are processed by the Quadro NVS M graphics card from Nvidia, the exact same one used in the previously reviewed TJG model. The drivers are configured to business applications and therefore offer best compatibility and stability.

Considering that we are interested in the best possible performance in this section, all performance tests were done with the NVS M on. Turning to the application performance tests , the PCMarkVantage benchmark awarded our test model an overall score of points. Taking a look at the individual scores that made up the total, we see a better Memory Score vs.

The recently reviewed Dell XPS 15 with a score of points is just about on par with the Optimus model. For all your data storage needs, the conventional Seagate STAS hard drive is at your disposal. Both T models perform relatively the same in the 3DMark tests.

Because of the relatively similar results of the 3DMark test and because the T is really meant for business use, we didn't run any more GPU or gaming tests. Something worth mentioning: The Optimus driver installed in notebook 8. An update can make certain applications run better. You can find the current version on the Nvidia website. The in-review Optimus-model of the T took us by surprise in running somewhat louder.

No matter the level of stress on the hardware, the system noise remained more noticeable than it did with the previously reviewed T model that used only its dedicated graphics card. This is astonishing because the power consumption under light use, that is, using the on-board Intel GMA HD graphics card should actually be lower. A conceivable cause of this completely chaotic, confusing conundrum could be connected to the card's not quite current driver.

Updating the graphics card driver to the current version The case temperature remains somewhat lower for the Optimus model of the T in idle mode as well as the stress test than for the non-Optimus model. This might be directly attributable to the cooling fan rather than being a benefit of the Optimus graphics card switching component. What's more, running 3DMark06 directly after the stress tests yields only slightly different results than the run-through done before the stress test.

As expected, the Optimus version helps out with increasing the battery life since the dedicated NVS M graphics card is automatically turned off under light use. If you take ridiculous measures to save energy and turn the screen brightness down to the minimum, turn off the WiFi and choose the Energy-Saver profile while squinting at your screen and not changing a thing, the notebook would run on battery power for a maximum of almost That is to say, those are the results of the BatteryEater tool's Reader's Test.

The previously reviewed T model without Optimus graphics card switching technology endured just over 7 hours in this test. In the typical-use tests, a similar result can be seen. Using the internet through WiFi at a screen brightness of 12 out of 15 with the Energy-Saver profile activated, the battery dies after just more than 7 hours , that is, about 3 hours more than the non-Optimus model. Under heavier use, the advantage of Optimus thins out.

In the DVD test , we were able to stuff our faces with popcorn for only 3 hours 20 minutes with the brightness turned all the way up, barely longer than with the other model. Finally, in the BatteryEater Classic test with maximum screen brightness, WiFi turned on and in the High-Performance profile, the tables actually turn and the non-Optimus version has the longer battery life. The cause of this might be the brighter screen of the model in review here. The minimum battery life also marks the only battery life test with both the GMA and NVS graphics cards activated and came out to vs.

The measurements regarding energy consumption weigh heavily in favor of the Optimus version. Under light use, our Optimus model uses about 2 watts less than the other non-Optimus model. What's also nice is that the notebook does not pass the 0.

Optimus or no Optimus, that is the question. But the Optimus graphics card switching technology finally housed within the Lenovo Thinkpad TGEG model means a considerably longer battery life under light use as compared to the non-Optimus TJG model. Under heavier use, the advantage of Optimus isn't as great and the non-Optimus model actually comes out on top by a little in terms of minimum battery life.

Aside from the display, the two laptops are identical in terms of hardware except for small differences in the RAM and HDD, bringing about no significant differences in the performance tests. The Optimus model does emit a bit more system noise but keeps the case cooler for it.

The non-reflective, matte screen exhibits a high brightess that's well distributed across the screen and an excellent contrast ratio. Lenovo has put together a great package for a well-rounded office notebook with modest 3D graphics potential. The matte screen with a broad color space and high resolution lends itself well to photo editing while remaining convenient for use in the office or outdoors. The matte full-HD screen with very good brightness—well distributed across the screen, excellent contrast and broad color space.

A device of this price range without necessary accessories like a recovery disk, media drivers, etc. The details on how this new feature affects the system as a whole and whether it's worth getting the upgrade, you'll find out in the following extensive review. T vs sRGB transparent. T vs AdobeRGB transparent. T vs MBP 17 transparent. T vs Dell XPS 15 transparent.

Gossen Mavo-Monitor. Outdoor Use. Post by roblm » Thu Oct 03, pm. Post by PihlT » Thu Oct 03, pm. Post by PihlT » Fri Oct 04, am. Post by roblm » Fri Oct 04, am. Post by PihlT » Fri Oct 04, pm. Post by roblm » Fri Oct 04, pm.

Privacy Terms. Skip to content. Quick links. Resolution on Thinkpad T Forum rules Before you post please read this. On another windows computer I have hooked up to the same monitor the resolution is x On the T the highest option I have is x Is it possible to get the same resolution I have on my windows pc?

Mint Mate Oldest rig is Mate Org 1. Re: Resolution on Thinkpad T Post by roblm » Wed Oct 02, pm Use these commands and post the output: xrandr --verbose and mokutil --sb-state. Code: Select all mokutil --sb-state EFI variables are not supported on this system.

I had a similar problem with a T and an ultrawide monitor, see here it's quite a long post : viewtopic. Detailed block string not properly terminated. Detailed mode: Clock Sometimes using a lower refresh rate like 50 or 55 Hz will work but the supported vertical frequency range from the EDID is Hz.

Linux lenovo thinkpad t510 excel ios

The ThinkPad Experience (and arch btw)

Следующая статья manga death is the only ending for the villainess

Другие материалы по теме

  • Fv24
  • Tdk ad90
  • Shelf in bathroom